| # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only | |
| config PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD | |
| bool | |
| config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD | |
| bool | |
| config PREEMPT_BUILD | |
| bool | |
| select PREEMPTION | |
| select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK | |
| choice | |
| prompt "Preemption Model" | |
| default PREEMPT_NONE | |
| config PREEMPT_NONE | |
| bool "No Forced Preemption (Server)" | |
| select PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC | |
| help | |
| This is the traditional Linux preemption model, geared towards | |
| throughput. It will still provide good latencies most of the | |
| time, but there are no guarantees and occasional longer delays | |
| are possible. | |
| Select this option if you are building a kernel for a server or | |
| scientific/computation system, or if you want to maximize the | |
| raw processing power of the kernel, irrespective of scheduling | |
| latencies. | |
| config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY | |
| bool "Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)" | |
| depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT | |
| select PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC | |
| help | |
| This option reduces the latency of the kernel by adding more | |
| "explicit preemption points" to the kernel code. These new | |
| preemption points have been selected to reduce the maximum | |
| latency of rescheduling, providing faster application reactions, | |
| at the cost of slightly lower throughput. | |
| This allows reaction to interactive events by allowing a | |
| low priority process to voluntarily preempt itself even if it | |
| is in kernel mode executing a system call. This allows | |
| applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the system is | |
| under load. | |
| Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop system. | |
| config PREEMPT | |
| bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)" | |
| depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT | |
| select PREEMPT_BUILD | |
| help | |
| This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making | |
| all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section) | |
| preemptible. This allows reaction to interactive events by | |
| permitting a low priority process to be preempted involuntarily | |
| even if it is in kernel mode executing a system call and would | |
| otherwise not be about to reach a natural preemption point. | |
| This allows applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the | |
| system is under load, at the cost of slightly lower throughput | |
| and a slight runtime overhead to kernel code. | |
| Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or | |
| embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds | |
| range. | |
| config PREEMPT_RT | |
| bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)" | |
| depends on EXPERT && ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT | |
| select PREEMPTION | |
| help | |
| This option turns the kernel into a real-time kernel by replacing | |
| various locking primitives (spinlocks, rwlocks, etc.) with | |
| preemptible priority-inheritance aware variants, enforcing | |
| interrupt threading and introducing mechanisms to break up long | |
| non-preemptible sections. This makes the kernel, except for very | |
| low level and critical code paths (entry code, scheduler, low | |
| level interrupt handling) fully preemptible and brings most | |
| execution contexts under scheduler control. | |
| Select this if you are building a kernel for systems which | |
| require real-time guarantees. | |
| endchoice | |
| config PREEMPT_COUNT | |
| bool | |
| config PREEMPTION | |
| bool | |
| select PREEMPT_COUNT | |
| config PREEMPT_DYNAMIC | |
| bool "Preemption behaviour defined on boot" | |
| depends on HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC && !PREEMPT_RT | |
| select JUMP_LABEL if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY | |
| select PREEMPT_BUILD | |
| default y if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL | |
| help | |
| This option allows to define the preemption model on the kernel | |
| command line parameter and thus override the default preemption | |
| model defined during compile time. | |
| The feature is primarily interesting for Linux distributions which | |
| provide a pre-built kernel binary to reduce the number of kernel | |
| flavors they offer while still offering different usecases. | |
| The runtime overhead is negligible with HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE enabled | |
| but if runtime patching is not available for the specific architecture | |
| then the potential overhead should be considered. | |
| Interesting if you want the same pre-built kernel should be used for | |
| both Server and Desktop workloads. | |
| config SCHED_CORE | |
| bool "Core Scheduling for SMT" | |
| depends on SCHED_SMT | |
| help | |
| This option permits Core Scheduling, a means of coordinated task | |
| selection across SMT siblings. When enabled -- see | |
| prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE) -- task selection ensures that all SMT siblings | |
| will execute a task from the same 'core group', forcing idle when no | |
| matching task is found. | |
| Use of this feature includes: | |
| - mitigation of some (not all) SMT side channels; | |
| - limiting SMT interference to improve determinism and/or performance. | |
| SCHED_CORE is default disabled. When it is enabled and unused, | |
| which is the likely usage by Linux distributions, there should | |
| be no measurable impact on performance. | |