| Split page table lock | |
| ===================== | |
| Originally, mm->page_table_lock spinlock protected all page tables of the | |
| mm_struct. But this approach leads to poor page fault scalability of | |
| multi-threaded applications due high contention on the lock. To improve | |
| scalability, split page table lock was introduced. | |
| With split page table lock we have separate per-table lock to serialize | |
| access to the table. At the moment we use split lock for PTE and PMD | |
| tables. Access to higher level tables protected by mm->page_table_lock. | |
| There are helpers to lock/unlock a table and other accessor functions: | |
| - pte_offset_map_lock() | |
| maps pte and takes PTE table lock, returns pointer to the taken | |
| lock; | |
| - pte_unmap_unlock() | |
| unlocks and unmaps PTE table; | |
| - pte_alloc_map_lock() | |
| allocates PTE table if needed and take the lock, returns pointer | |
| to taken lock or NULL if allocation failed; | |
| - pte_lockptr() | |
| returns pointer to PTE table lock; | |
| - pmd_lock() | |
| takes PMD table lock, returns pointer to taken lock; | |
| - pmd_lockptr() | |
| returns pointer to PMD table lock; | |
| Split page table lock for PTE tables is enabled compile-time if | |
| CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS (usually 4) is less or equal to NR_CPUS. | |
| If split lock is disabled, all tables guaded by mm->page_table_lock. | |
| Split page table lock for PMD tables is enabled, if it's enabled for PTE | |
| tables and the architecture supports it (see below). | |
| Hugetlb and split page table lock | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| Hugetlb can support several page sizes. We use split lock only for PMD | |
| level, but not for PUD. | |
| Hugetlb-specific helpers: | |
| - huge_pte_lock() | |
| takes pmd split lock for PMD_SIZE page, mm->page_table_lock | |
| otherwise; | |
| - huge_pte_lockptr() | |
| returns pointer to table lock; | |
| Support of split page table lock by an architecture | |
| --------------------------------------------------- | |
| There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: | |
| everything required is done by pgtable_page_ctor() and pgtable_page_dtor(), | |
| which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. | |
| Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table | |
| allocation: slab uses page->slab_cache for its pages. | |
| This field shares storage with page->ptl. | |
| PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table | |
| levels. | |
| PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table | |
| allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. | |
| Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and | |
| pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing | |
| paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). | |
| With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. | |
| NOTE: pgtable_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must | |
| be handled properly. | |
| page->ptl | |
| --------- | |
| page->ptl is used to access split page table lock, where 'page' is struct | |
| page of page containing the table. It shares storage with page->private | |
| (and few other fields in union). | |
| To avoid increasing size of struct page and have best performance, we use a | |
| trick: | |
| - if spinlock_t fits into long, we use page->ptr as spinlock, so we | |
| can avoid indirect access and save a cache line. | |
| - if size of spinlock_t is bigger then size of long, we use page->ptl as | |
| pointer to spinlock_t and allocate it dynamically. This allows to use | |
| split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs | |
| one more cache line for indirect access; | |
| The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_page_ctor() for PTE table and in | |
| pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. | |
| Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. |