| Linux Kernel patch submission checklist | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Here are some basic things that developers should do if they want to see their | |
| kernel patch submissions accepted more quickly. | |
| These are all above and beyond the documentation that is provided in | |
| Documentation/SubmittingPatches and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux | |
| kernel patches. | |
| 1: Builds cleanly with applicable or modified CONFIG options =y, =m, and | |
| =n. No gcc warnings/errors, no linker warnings/errors. | |
| 2: Passes allnoconfig, allmodconfig | |
| 3: Builds on multiple CPU architectures by using local cross-compile tools | |
| or something like PLM at OSDL. | |
| 4: ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it | |
| tends to use `unsigned long' for 64-bit quantities. | |
| 5: Matches kernel coding style(!) | |
| 6: Any new or modified CONFIG options don't muck up the config menu. | |
| 7: All new Kconfig options have help text. | |
| 8: Has been carefully reviewed with respect to relevant Kconfig | |
| combinations. This is very hard to get right with testing -- brainpower | |
| pays off here. | |
| 9: Check cleanly with sparse. | |
| 10: Use 'make checkstack' and 'make namespacecheck' and fix any problems | |
| that they find. Note: checkstack does not point out problems explicitly, | |
| but any one function that uses more than 512 bytes on the stack is a | |
| candidate for change. | |
| 11: Include kernel-doc to document global kernel APIs. (Not required for | |
| static functions, but OK there also.) Use 'make htmldocs' or 'make | |
| mandocs' to check the kernel-doc and fix any issues. | |
| 12: Has been tested with CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, | |
| CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES, | |
| CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP all simultaneously | |
| enabled. | |
| 13: Has been build- and runtime tested with and without CONFIG_SMP and | |
| CONFIG_PREEMPT. | |
| 14: If the patch affects IO/Disk, etc: has been tested with and without | |
| CONFIG_LBD. | |
| 15: All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled. | |
| 16: All new /proc entries are documented under Documentation/ | |
| 17: All new kernel boot parameters are documented in | |
| Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt. | |
| 18: All new module parameters are documented with MODULE_PARM_DESC() | |
| 19: All new userspace interfaces are documented in Documentation/ABI/. | |
| See Documentation/ABI/README for more information. | |
| 20: Check that it all passes `make headers_check'. | |
| 21: Has been checked with injection of at least slab and page-allocation | |
| failures. See Documentation/fault-injection/. | |
| If the new code is substantial, addition of subsystem-specific fault | |
| injection might be appropriate. | |
| 22: Newly-added code has been compiled with `gcc -W' (use "make | |
| EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W"). This will generate lots of noise, but is good for | |
| finding bugs like "warning: comparison between signed and unsigned". | |
| 23: Tested after it has been merged into the -mm patchset to make sure | |
| that it still works with all of the other queued patches and various | |
| changes in the VM, VFS, and other subsystems. | |
| 24: Avoid whitespace damage such as indenting with spaces or whitespace | |
| at the end of lines. You can test this by feeding the patch to | |
| "git apply --check --whitespace=error-all" | |
| 25: Check your patch for general style as detailed in | |
| Documentation/CodingStyle. Check for trivial violations with the | |
| patch style checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl). | |
| You should be able to justify all violations that remain in | |
| your patch. |