|  | Compile-time stack metadata validation | 
|  | ====================================== | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Overview | 
|  | -------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The kernel CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION option enables a host tool named | 
|  | objtool which runs at compile time.  It has a "check" subcommand which | 
|  | analyzes every .o file and ensures the validity of its stack metadata. | 
|  | It enforces a set of rules on asm code and C inline assembly code so | 
|  | that stack traces can be reliable. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Currently it only checks frame pointer usage, but there are plans to add | 
|  | CFI validation for C files and CFI generation for asm files. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and | 
|  | validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It also follows code paths involving special sections, like | 
|  | .altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add | 
|  | alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of | 
|  | instructions).  Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for | 
|  | which gcc sometimes uses jump tables. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Why do we need stack metadata validation? | 
|  | ----------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata: | 
|  |  | 
|  | a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels | 
|  |  | 
|  | Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes.  They allow runtime | 
|  | code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the | 
|  | chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing | 
|  | code. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by | 
|  | CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER.  For some other architectures they may be | 
|  | required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers"). | 
|  |  | 
|  | For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up | 
|  | frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used. | 
|  |  | 
|  | But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by | 
|  | hand, which most people don't do.  So the end result is that | 
|  | CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all | 
|  | functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame | 
|  | and update the frame pointer.  If a first function doesn't properly | 
|  | create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller* | 
|  | of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame | 
|  | pointers enabled: | 
|  |  | 
|  | [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 | 
|  | [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 | 
|  | [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 | 
|  | [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 | 
|  | [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 | 
|  |  | 
|  | It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is | 
|  | seq_read(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by | 
|  | replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's | 
|  | what it looks like instead: | 
|  |  | 
|  | [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 | 
|  | [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 | 
|  | [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 | 
|  | [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 | 
|  | [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been | 
|  | skipped.  Instead the stack trace seems to show that | 
|  | cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all* | 
|  | functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be | 
|  | skipped on a stack trace. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very | 
|  | beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created, | 
|  | or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been | 
|  | destroyed.  This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers. | 
|  |  | 
|  | b) 100% reliable stack traces for DWARF enabled kernels | 
|  |  | 
|  | (NOTE: This is not yet implemented) | 
|  |  | 
|  | As an alternative to frame pointers, DWARF Call Frame Information | 
|  | (CFI) metadata can be used to walk the stack.  Unlike frame pointers, | 
|  | CFI metadata is out of band.  So it doesn't affect runtime | 
|  | performance and it can be reliable even when interrupts or exceptions | 
|  | are involved. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For C code, gcc automatically generates DWARF CFI metadata.  But for | 
|  | asm code, generating CFI is a tedious manual approach which requires | 
|  | manually placed .cfi assembler macros to be scattered throughout the | 
|  | code.  It's clumsy and very easy to get wrong, and it makes the real | 
|  | code harder to read. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Stacktool will improve this situation in several ways.  For code | 
|  | which already has CFI annotations, it will validate them.  For code | 
|  | which doesn't have CFI annotations, it will generate them.  So an | 
|  | architecture can opt to strip out all the manual .cfi annotations | 
|  | from their asm code and have objtool generate them instead. | 
|  |  | 
|  | We might also add a runtime stack validation debug option where we | 
|  | periodically walk the stack from schedule() and/or an NMI to ensure | 
|  | that the stack metadata is sane and that we reach the bottom of the | 
|  | stack. | 
|  |  | 
|  | So the benefit of objtool here will be that external tooling should | 
|  | always show perfect stack traces.  And the same will be true for | 
|  | kernel warning/oops traces if the architecture has a runtime DWARF | 
|  | unwinder. | 
|  |  | 
|  | c) Higher live patching compatibility rate | 
|  |  | 
|  | Livepatch has an optional "consistency model", which is needed for | 
|  | more complex patches.  In order for the consistency model to work, | 
|  | stack traces need to be reliable (or an unreliable condition needs to | 
|  | be detectable).  Objtool makes that possible. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For more details, see the livepatch documentation in the Linux kernel | 
|  | source tree at Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.txt. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Rules | 
|  | ----- | 
|  |  | 
|  | To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF | 
|  | function type.  In asm code, this is typically done using the | 
|  | ENTRY/ENDPROC macros.  If objtool finds a return instruction | 
|  | outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates | 
|  | callable code which should be annotated accordingly. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each | 
|  | callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable should *not* | 
|  | be annotated as an ELF function.  The ENDPROC macro shouldn't be used | 
|  | in this case. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This rule is needed so that objtool can ignore non-callable code. | 
|  | Such code doesn't have to follow any of the other rules. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3. Each callable function which calls another function must have the | 
|  | correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or | 
|  | the architecture's back chain rules.  This can by done in asm code | 
|  | with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as | 
|  | designed.  If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling | 
|  | function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack | 
|  | trace. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4. Dynamic jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if: | 
|  |  | 
|  | a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or | 
|  |  | 
|  | b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has | 
|  | the same value it had on function entry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a | 
|  | function's code paths.  If a function jumps to code in another file, | 
|  | and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump | 
|  | because it only analyzes a single file at a time. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions. | 
|  | The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code, | 
|  | which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions | 
|  | return normally. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Objtool warnings | 
|  | ---------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | For asm files, if you're getting an error which doesn't make sense, | 
|  | first make sure that the affected code follows the above rules. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For C files, the common culprits are inline asm statements and calls to | 
|  | "noreturn" functions.  See below for more details. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes | 
|  | -fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what | 
|  | they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup | 
|  |  | 
|  | The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or | 
|  | updating the frame pointer, and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the error is for an asm file, and func() is indeed a callable | 
|  | function, add proper frame pointer logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and | 
|  | FRAME_END macros.  Otherwise, if it's not a callable function, remove | 
|  | its ELF function annotation by changing ENDPROC to END, and instead | 
|  | use the manual CFI hint macros in asm/undwarf.h. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If it's a GCC-compiled .c file, the error may be because the function | 
|  | uses an inline asm() statement which has a "call" instruction.  An | 
|  | asm() statement with a call instruction must declare the use of the | 
|  | stack pointer in its output operand.  For example, on x86_64: | 
|  |  | 
|  | register void *__sp asm("rsp"); | 
|  | asm volatile("call func" : "+r" (__sp)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: unreachable instruction | 
|  |  | 
|  | Objtool couldn't find a code path to reach the instruction. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the error is for an asm file, and the instruction is inside (or | 
|  | reachable from) a callable function, the function should be annotated | 
|  | with the ENTRY/ENDPROC macros (ENDPROC is the important one). | 
|  | Otherwise, the code should probably be annotated with the CFI hint | 
|  | macros in asm/undwarf.h so objtool and the unwinder can know the | 
|  | stack state associated with the code. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you're 100% sure the code won't affect stack traces, or if you're | 
|  | a just a bad person, you can tell objtool to ignore it.  See the | 
|  | "Adding exceptions" section below. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code), | 
|  | change ENDPROC to END. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4. file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction | 
|  | or | 
|  | file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction | 
|  |  | 
|  | Does the file have data in a text section?  If so, that can confuse | 
|  | objtool's instruction decoder.  Move the data to a more appropriate | 
|  | section like .data or .rodata. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: unsupported instruction in callable function | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or iret.  Such | 
|  | instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most | 
|  | likely part of the kernel entry code.  They should usually not have | 
|  | the callable function annotation (ENDPROC) and should always be | 
|  | annotated with the CFI hint macros in asm/undwarf.h. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 6. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is a dynamic jump or a jump to an undefined symbol.  Objtool | 
|  | assumed it's a sibling call and detected that the frame pointer | 
|  | wasn't first restored to its original state. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to move the | 
|  | destination code to the local file. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g. | 
|  | kernel entry code), change ENDPROC to END and annotate manually with | 
|  | the CFI hint macros in asm/undwarf.h. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 7. file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: stack state mismatch | 
|  |  | 
|  | The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on | 
|  | which execution path was taken to reach the instruction. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Make sure that, when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled, the function | 
|  | pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for x86_64, this means rbp) at | 
|  | the beginning of the function and pops it at the end of the function. | 
|  | Also make sure that no other code in the function touches the frame | 
|  | pointer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Another possibility is that the code has some asm or inline asm which | 
|  | does some unusual things to the stack or the frame pointer.  In such | 
|  | cases it's probably appropriate to use the CFI hint macros in | 
|  | asm/undwarf.h. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | 8. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB() | 
|  |  | 
|  | This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an | 
|  | unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function | 
|  | can fall through into the next function.  There could be different | 
|  | reasons for this: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like | 
|  | panic().  In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to | 
|  | objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array.  Feel free to bug the | 
|  | objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code | 
|  | that is actually reachable. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3) If funcA() calls an inline function, the object code for funcA() | 
|  | might be corrupt due to a gcc bug.  For more details, see: | 
|  | https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool. | 
|  | Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Adding exceptions | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure | 
|  | that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to | 
|  | ignore it: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD | 
|  | macro. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - To skip validation of a file, add | 
|  |  | 
|  | OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := n | 
|  |  | 
|  | to the Makefile. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - To skip validation of a directory, add | 
|  |  | 
|  | OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y | 
|  |  | 
|  | to the Makefile. |