lockdep: Check the depth of subclass

Current look_up_lock_class() doesn't check the parameter "subclass".
This rarely rises problems because the main caller of this function,
register_lock_class(), checks it.

But register_lock_class() is not the only function which calls
look_up_lock_class(). lock_set_class() and its callees also call it.
And lock_set_class() doesn't check this parameter.

This will rise problems when the the value of subclass is larger than
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES. Because the address (used as the key of class)
caliculated with too large subclass has a probability to point
another key in different lock_class_key.

Of course this problem depends on the memory layout and
occurs with really low probability.

Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1286958626-986-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

kernel/lockdep.c

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index bc4d328..42ba65d 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -639,6 +639,16 @@
 	}
 #endif
 
+	if (unlikely(subclass >= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES)) {
+		debug_locks_off();
+		printk(KERN_ERR
+			"BUG: looking up invalid subclass: %u\n", subclass);
+		printk(KERN_ERR
+			"turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
+		dump_stack();
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Static locks do not have their class-keys yet - for them the key
 	 * is the lock object itself:
@@ -2745,14 +2755,6 @@
 	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (unlikely(subclass >= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES)) {
-		debug_locks_off();
-		printk("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!\n");
-		printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
-		dump_stack();
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	if (lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
 		check = 1;