| /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ |
| #ifndef _ASM_HASH_H |
| #define _ASM_HASH_H |
| |
| /* |
| * Fortunately, most people who want to run Linux on Microblaze enable |
| * both multiplier and barrel shifter, but omitting them is technically |
| * a supported configuration. |
| * |
| * With just a barrel shifter, we can implement an efficient constant |
| * multiply using shifts and adds. GCC can find a 9-step solution, but |
| * this 6-step solution was found by Yevgen Voronenko's implementation |
| * of the Hcub algorithm at http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html. |
| * |
| * That software is really not designed for a single multiplier this large, |
| * but if you run it enough times with different seeds, it'll find several |
| * 6-shift, 6-add sequences for computing x * 0x61C88647. They are all |
| * c = (x << 19) + x; |
| * a = (x << 9) + c; |
| * b = (x << 23) + a; |
| * return (a<<11) + (b<<6) + (c<<3) - b; |
| * with variations on the order of the final add. |
| * |
| * Without even a shifter, it's hopless; any hash function will suck. |
| */ |
| |
| #if CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_HW_MUL == 0 |
| |
| #define HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 1 |
| |
| /* Multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_32 = 0x61C88647 */ |
| static inline u32 __attribute_const__ __hash_32(u32 a) |
| { |
| #if CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_BARREL |
| unsigned int b, c; |
| |
| /* Phase 1: Compute three intermediate values */ |
| b = a << 23; |
| c = (a << 19) + a; |
| a = (a << 9) + c; |
| b += a; |
| |
| /* Phase 2: Compute (a << 11) + (b << 6) + (c << 3) - b */ |
| a <<= 5; |
| a += b; /* (a << 5) + b */ |
| a <<= 3; |
| a += c; /* (a << 8) + (b << 3) + c */ |
| a <<= 3; |
| return a - b; /* (a << 11) + (b << 6) + (c << 3) - b */ |
| #else |
| /* |
| * "This is really going to hurt." |
| * |
| * Without a barrel shifter, left shifts are implemented as |
| * repeated additions, and the best we can do is an optimal |
| * addition-subtraction chain. This one is not known to be |
| * optimal, but at 37 steps, it's decent for a 31-bit multiplier. |
| * |
| * Question: given its size (37*4 = 148 bytes per instance), |
| * and slowness, is this worth having inline? |
| */ |
| unsigned int b, c, d; |
| |
| b = a << 4; /* 4 */ |
| c = b << 1; /* 1 5 */ |
| b += a; /* 1 6 */ |
| c += b; /* 1 7 */ |
| c <<= 3; /* 3 10 */ |
| c -= a; /* 1 11 */ |
| d = c << 7; /* 7 18 */ |
| d += b; /* 1 19 */ |
| d <<= 8; /* 8 27 */ |
| d += a; /* 1 28 */ |
| d <<= 1; /* 1 29 */ |
| d += b; /* 1 30 */ |
| d <<= 6; /* 6 36 */ |
| return d + c; /* 1 37 total instructions*/ |
| #endif |
| } |
| |
| #endif /* !CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_HW_MUL */ |
| #endif /* _ASM_HASH_H */ |