| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| |
| ========================================= |
| KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel |
| ========================================= |
| |
| .. toctree:: |
| :maxdepth: 2 |
| |
| start |
| usage |
| api/index |
| faq |
| |
| What is KUnit? |
| ============== |
| |
| KUnit is a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. |
| These tests are able to be run locally on a developer's workstation without a VM |
| or special hardware. |
| |
| KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's ``unittest.mock``, and |
| Googletest/Googlemock for C++; it provides many of the same features in a |
| similar manner (mocking, spying, assertions, etc) in a way that makes sense |
| with the Linux kernel's flavor of C. |
| |
| Get started now: :doc:`start` |
| |
| Why KUnit? |
| ========== |
| |
| Aside from KUnit there is no true unit testing framework for the Linux kernel. |
| Autotest and kselftest are sometimes cited as unit testing frameworks; however, |
| they are not by most reasonable definitions of unit tests. |
| |
| A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the |
| name. A unit test should be the finest granularity of testing and as such should |
| allow all possible code paths to be tested in the code under test; this is only |
| possible if the code under test is very small and does not have any external |
| dependencies outside of the test's control like hardware. |
| |
| Outside of KUnit, there are no testing frameworks currently |
| available for the kernel that do not require installing the kernel on a test |
| machine or in a VM and all require tests to be written in userspace running on |
| the kernel; this is true for Autotest, and kselftest, disqualifying |
| any of them from being considered unit testing frameworks. |
| |
| KUnit addresses the problem of being able to run tests without needing a virtual |
| machine or actual hardware with User Mode Linux. User Mode Linux is a Linux |
| architecture, like ARM or x86; however, unlike other architectures it compiles |
| to a standalone program that can be run like any other program directly inside |
| of a host operating system; to be clear, it does not require any virtualization |
| support; it is just a regular program. |
| |
| KUnit is fast. Excluding build time, from invocation to completion KUnit can run |
| several dozen tests in only 10 to 20 seconds; this might not sound like a big |
| deal to some people, but having such fast and easy to run tests fundamentally |
| changes the way you go about testing and even writing code in the first place. |
| Linus himself said in his `git talk at Google |
| <https://gist.github.com/lorn/1272686/revisions#diff-53c65572127855f1b003db4064a94573R874>`_: |
| |
| "... a lot of people seem to think that performance is about doing the |
| same thing, just doing it faster, and that is not true. That is not what |
| performance is all about. If you can do something really fast, really |
| well, people will start using it differently." |
| |
| In this context Linus was talking about branching and merging, |
| but this point also applies to testing. If your tests are slow, unreliable, are |
| difficult to write, and require a special setup or special hardware to run, |
| then you wait a lot longer to write tests, and you wait a lot longer to run |
| tests; this means that tests are likely to break, unlikely to test a lot of |
| things, and are unlikely to be rerun once they pass. If your tests are really |
| fast, you run them all the time, everytime you make a change, and everytime |
| someone sends you some code. Why trust that someone ran all their tests |
| correctly on every change when you can just run them yourself in less time than |
| it takes to read his / her test log? |
| |
| How do I use it? |
| =================== |
| |
| * :doc:`start` - for new users of KUnit |
| * :doc:`usage` - for a more detailed explanation of KUnit features |
| * :doc:`api/index` - for the list of KUnit APIs used for testing |
| |