locking/core: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency() users
With the s390 special case of a yielding cpu_relax() implementation gone,
we can now remove all users of cpu_relax_lowlatency() and replace them
with cpu_relax().
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477386195-32736-5-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 17a88e9..a65e09a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
break;
}
- cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+ cpu_relax();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock,
* memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
* values at the cost of a few extra spins.
*/
- cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+ cpu_relax();
}
if (!waiter)
