)]}'
{
  "commit": "c8020a67e625c714c4dbedc8ae2944b461e204ec",
  "tree": "12ad0e02b6e30dffd8c7e2b24cdb278a6b799ad4",
  "parents": [
    "5fd4dc068c4ded1339180dbcd1a99e15b1c0a728"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Paul E. McKenney",
    "email": "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com",
    "time": "Fri Aug 10 16:55:59 2012 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Paul E. McKenney",
    "email": "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com",
    "time": "Sun Sep 23 07:42:51 2012 -0700"
  },
  "message": "rcu: Protect rcu_node accesses during CPU stall warnings\n\nThe print_other_cpu_stall() function accesses a number of rcu_node\nfields without protection from the -\u003elock.  In theory, this is not\na problem because the fields accessed are all integers, but in\npractice the compiler can get nasty.  Therefore, the commit extends\nthe existing critical section to cover the entire loop body.\n\nSigned-off-by: Paul E. McKenney \u003cpaulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "2c4ee4cdbc0e7c900c9603a69e1ed9c82075a1be",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "kernel/rcutree.c",
      "new_id": "2cf8eb3e2d435828afb1e149606aa8277efee947",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "kernel/rcutree.c"
    }
  ]
}