ipv6: remove rt6i_peer_genid from rt6_info and its handler

6431cbc25f(Create a mechanism for upward inetpeer propagation into routes)
introduces these codes, but this mechanism is never enabled since
rt6i_peer_genid always is zero whether it is not assigned or assigned by
rt6_peer_genid(). After 5943634fc5 (ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info
in struct rtable again), the ipv4 related codes of this mechanism has been
removed, I think we maybe able to remove them now.

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/ipv6/route.c

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index c1cfcb7..6863f8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -321,13 +321,6 @@
 	}
 }
 
-static atomic_t __rt6_peer_genid = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-
-static u32 rt6_peer_genid(void)
-{
-	return atomic_read(&__rt6_peer_genid);
-}
-
 void rt6_bind_peer(struct rt6_info *rt, int create)
 {
 	struct inet_peer_base *base;
@@ -341,8 +334,6 @@
 	if (peer) {
 		if (!rt6_set_peer(rt, peer))
 			inet_putpeer(peer);
-		else
-			rt->rt6i_peer_genid = rt6_peer_genid();
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1099,14 +1090,9 @@
 	if (rt->rt6i_genid != rt_genid(dev_net(rt->dst.dev)))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie)) {
-		if (rt->rt6i_peer_genid != rt6_peer_genid()) {
-			if (!rt6_has_peer(rt))
-				rt6_bind_peer(rt, 0);
-			rt->rt6i_peer_genid = rt6_peer_genid();
-		}
+	if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie))
 		return dst;
-	}
+
 	return NULL;
 }