[PATCH] fix deadlocks in AUDIT_LIST/AUDIT_LIST_RULES
We should not send a pile of replies while holding audit_netlink_mutex
since we hold the same mutex when we receive commands. As the result,
we can get blocked while sending and sit there holding the mutex while
auditctl is unable to send the next command and get around to receiving
what we'd sent.
Solution: create skb and put them into a queue instead of sending;
once we are done, send what we've got on the list. The former can
be done synchronously while we are handling AUDIT_LIST or AUDIT_LIST_RULES;
we are holding audit_netlink_mutex at that point. The latter is done
asynchronously and without messing with audit_netlink_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 7c13490..ccfea6d 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -510,19 +510,12 @@
/* List rules using struct audit_rule. Exists for backward
* compatibility with userspace. */
-static int audit_list(void *_dest)
+static void audit_list(int pid, int seq, struct sk_buff_head *q)
{
- int pid, seq;
- int *dest = _dest;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
struct audit_entry *entry;
int i;
- pid = dest[0];
- seq = dest[1];
- kfree(dest);
-
- mutex_lock(&audit_netlink_mutex);
-
/* The *_rcu iterators not needed here because we are
always called with audit_netlink_mutex held. */
for (i=0; i<AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
@@ -532,31 +525,25 @@
rule = audit_krule_to_rule(&entry->rule);
if (unlikely(!rule))
break;
- audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 0, 1,
+ skb = audit_make_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 0, 1,
rule, sizeof(*rule));
+ if (skb)
+ skb_queue_tail(q, skb);
kfree(rule);
}
}
- audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
-
- mutex_unlock(&audit_netlink_mutex);
- return 0;
+ skb = audit_make_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
+ if (skb)
+ skb_queue_tail(q, skb);
}
/* List rules using struct audit_rule_data. */
-static int audit_list_rules(void *_dest)
+static void audit_list_rules(int pid, int seq, struct sk_buff_head *q)
{
- int pid, seq;
- int *dest = _dest;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
struct audit_entry *e;
int i;
- pid = dest[0];
- seq = dest[1];
- kfree(dest);
-
- mutex_lock(&audit_netlink_mutex);
-
/* The *_rcu iterators not needed here because we are
always called with audit_netlink_mutex held. */
for (i=0; i<AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
@@ -566,15 +553,16 @@
data = audit_krule_to_data(&e->rule);
if (unlikely(!data))
break;
- audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST_RULES, 0, 1,
+ skb = audit_make_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST_RULES, 0, 1,
data, sizeof(*data));
+ if (skb)
+ skb_queue_tail(q, skb);
kfree(data);
}
}
- audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST_RULES, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
-
- mutex_unlock(&audit_netlink_mutex);
- return 0;
+ skb = audit_make_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST_RULES, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
+ if (skb)
+ skb_queue_tail(q, skb);
}
/**
@@ -592,7 +580,7 @@
size_t datasz, uid_t loginuid, u32 sid)
{
struct task_struct *tsk;
- int *dest;
+ struct audit_netlink_list *dest;
int err = 0;
struct audit_entry *entry;
@@ -605,18 +593,20 @@
* happen if we're actually running in the context of auditctl
* trying to _send_ the stuff */
- dest = kmalloc(2 * sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+ dest = kmalloc(sizeof(struct audit_netlink_list), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dest)
return -ENOMEM;
- dest[0] = pid;
- dest[1] = seq;
+ dest->pid = pid;
+ skb_queue_head_init(&dest->q);
if (type == AUDIT_LIST)
- tsk = kthread_run(audit_list, dest, "audit_list");
+ audit_list(pid, seq, &dest->q);
else
- tsk = kthread_run(audit_list_rules, dest,
- "audit_list_rules");
+ audit_list_rules(pid, seq, &dest->q);
+
+ tsk = kthread_run(audit_send_list, dest, "audit_send_list");
if (IS_ERR(tsk)) {
+ skb_queue_purge(&dest->q);
kfree(dest);
err = PTR_ERR(tsk);
}
