diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
index a174605..bec0a08 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -1627,8 +1627,9 @@
 }
 
 int
-cifs_rename(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
-	    struct inode *target_dir, struct dentry *target_dentry)
+cifs_rename2(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
+	     struct inode *target_dir, struct dentry *target_dentry,
+	     unsigned int flags)
 {
 	char *from_name = NULL;
 	char *to_name = NULL;
@@ -1640,6 +1641,9 @@
 	unsigned int xid;
 	int rc, tmprc;
 
+	if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(source_dir->i_sb);
 	tlink = cifs_sb_tlink(cifs_sb);
 	if (IS_ERR(tlink))
@@ -1667,6 +1671,12 @@
 	rc = cifs_do_rename(xid, source_dentry, from_name, target_dentry,
 			    to_name);
 
+	/*
+	 * No-replace is the natural behavior for CIFS, so skip unlink hacks.
+	 */
+	if (flags & RENAME_NOREPLACE)
+		goto cifs_rename_exit;
+
 	if (rc == -EEXIST && tcon->unix_ext) {
 		/*
 		 * Are src and dst hardlinks of same inode? We can only tell