PM / devfreq: Fix devfreq_remove_device() to improve the sequence of resource free
This patch modify devfreq_remove_device() to improve the sequence of resource
free. If executing existing devfreq_remove_device(), this function always
executes _remove_devfreq() twice. In result, second _remove_devfreq() always
return error value. So, This patch resolves complicated function sequence
as following:
[Flow sequence before modification]
devfreq_remove_device()
_remove_devfreq(devfreq, false)
kfree(devfreq); /* Free devfreq */
if (!skip ...) { /* skip is false */
device_unregister(&devfreq->dev)
put_device(&devfreq->dev);
...
dev->release()
devfreq_dev_release()
_remove_devfreq(devfreq, true) <- Recall to free devfreq
/*
* Always return error without freeing resource because
* already _remove_devfreq() frees the memory of devfreq.
*/
}
[Flow sequence after modification]
devfreq_remove_device
device_unregister(&devfreq->dev)
put_device(&devfreq->dev);
..
dev->release()
devfreq_dev_release()
_remove_devfreq()
kfree(devfreq); /* Free devfreq */
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
[Merge conflict resolved by MyungJoo]
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 2042ec3..af4af77 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@
* @devfreq: the devfreq struct
* @skip: skip calling device_unregister().
*/
-static void _remove_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq, bool skip)
+static void _remove_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
{
mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
if (IS_ERR(find_device_devfreq(devfreq->dev.parent))) {
@@ -412,11 +412,6 @@
if (devfreq->profile->exit)
devfreq->profile->exit(devfreq->dev.parent);
- if (!skip && get_device(&devfreq->dev)) {
- device_unregister(&devfreq->dev);
- put_device(&devfreq->dev);
- }
-
mutex_destroy(&devfreq->lock);
kfree(devfreq);
}
@@ -426,14 +421,12 @@
* @dev: the devfreq device
*
* This calls _remove_devfreq() if _remove_devfreq() is not called.
- * Note that devfreq_dev_release() could be called by _remove_devfreq() as
- * well as by others unregistering the device.
*/
static void devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct devfreq *devfreq = to_devfreq(dev);
- _remove_devfreq(devfreq, true);
+ _remove_devfreq(devfreq);
}
/**
@@ -544,7 +537,8 @@
if (!devfreq)
return -EINVAL;
- _remove_devfreq(devfreq, false);
+ device_unregister(&devfreq->dev);
+ put_device(&devfreq->dev);
return 0;
}